So, it's the week of the 1940 Club this week, which is being hosted by Simon at Stuck in a Book and Karen at Kaggsy's Bookish Ramblings.
Sadly, I've been a bit busy this week so reading more than one book has not been possible. I didn't even intend to read this one, I'd chosen something else, but The Dean Street Press people put a list of 1940 books on their twitter feed and Bleeding Hooks by Harriet Rutland sounded intriguing and is only 99p, so I grabbed it for my Kindle.
The book is set in Wales in an inn beside a lake where fishing is very popular. But it's October and the end of the season, so catches are irratic and uncertain: in the summer this is a fisherman's paradise. A motley group of people have gathered, all addicted to fishing, apart from several women who are sisters or sweethearts of the men. One other woman, middle-aged Mrs. Mumsby, is something else entirely. She claims to be an ardent fishing fan too but the others suspect she's not and that the only thing she wants to catch is a new man. They make her a figure of fun, she's despised by all to be honest, and doesn't help matters by flirting with all the men and making them feel uncomfortable.
Thus, it's no surprise when she dies by the side of the lake. It's an odd death... she's found with a salmon fly embedded in her hand and at first it's thought she died of the shock. But a few people are not happy. Among them an engaged couple 'Pussy' Partridge and 'Piggy' Gunn. Both suspect foul play but it's not until they come across another of the group, Mr. Winkley, examining the crime scene at night, that they realise they're not alone in their suspicions. Winkley works at Scotland Yard and is ideally placed to help them investigate. Everyone thinks Mrs. Mumsby's death is an accident but why would she have been messing around with a salmon fly when the salmon season is over?
Harriet Rutland was the pen name of Olive Shimwell. She wrote three books, Knock, Murderer, Knock!, Bleeding Hooks and Blue Murder. The first two have Mr. Winkley as the detective, but possibly not the third. From reading a couple of reviews on Amazon and Goodreads it appears Bleeding Hooks is the least poular of the three. I can see why. Partly, it's because I don't fish so a lot of the terminolgy was lost on me. But also there were a lot of characters and I struggled a bit to remember who was who and what they had done to make them suspects. It was also, in my opinion only, quite easy to guess the culprit.
A book published in 1940 is going to be 'of its time' of course. Piggy seemed to have no problem with calling herself 'stupid' or with the boyfriend doing the same. The other thing was that they weren't a particularly charming lot. I realise Mrs. Mumsby did not help herself but equally they were horrible to her. And not much better to each other really. A very odd and unpleasant lot and I kept hoping someone would knock off a few more of them... Mr. Winkley, who was investigating, could've been quite interesting I felt. He was not an actual detective with Scotland Yard, more an ideas man in an office that people went to for solutions to problems, but not a lot was made of that, which I thought was a shame.
What was very good was the sense of place. Welsh lakes are exactly as the author described them and I loved the descriptions of the scenery and the unpredictable weather. The inn sounded gorgeous too, I would happily stay there. I wondered if it was based on Bala Lake which is a gorgeous spot in Gwynedd, Wales. There are plenty of other possibilities though as Wales is full of lakes and reservoirs.
Anyway, for me Bleeding Hooks was a solid vintage detective story, made interesting by the Welsh setting and by not being a police procedural with a traditional detective. And the fishing background was something a bit different too. For the princely sun of 99p I was quite happy.
12 comments:
I'm not much of a one for fishing, either, Cath, so I know what you mean about that. The setting does sound appealing, though, and I'd imagine a place like that would be very popular with people who love fishing. As for the characters, I'm with you; I prefer my characters - at least some of them - to be sympathetic. All that said, though, I'm glad you found a few things to like about this one!
Oh, an interesting one! I don't like fishing either, so would have struggled with that element, but I do love Wales so that would have been a plus. But I do take your point about the characters - I think you have to at least be onside with the detectives or the book might be a bit of a struggle. And it does sound a shame that more of the characters weren't killed off!!
Margot: I think if I had had a relative who fished I could quite easily have fallen into the hobby as my hometown is Penzance, ideal for fishing. But I didn't so it didn't happen. It is nicer if someone in a book is a sympathetic character but there wasn't anyone in particular to identify with so that was a little problematic. No matter, I liked the book despite that, a solid 3 star read.
Karen: It was certainly different and I don't think anyone else read this, not that I'm very surprised. LOL! Wales came over beautifully, like you I'm a fan so that was a real plus. More deaths would've been good but you can't have everything...
Sometimes it is really good to lose myself in one of these 'vintage' murder mysteries, where the pace of everything seems much slower, the author spends time describing everything in minute detail, and where no one needs to think about being PC!
I am not one for fishing myself, although back in the day I spent many an hour (day, week) sat in the car, as close to the riverbank as possible, while D fished. I was usually reading, between answering the many incoming calls from his office, as although we were supposed to be on holiday, the message never always seemed to get through to all his staff. He hasn't picked up his rods in many a long year though, as he now works for the man, so holidays are sacrosanct and uninterrupted.
I know the Gwynedd area of Wales quite well, as our best friends from the RAF days now live up there. We haven't managed to visit for a while now, as she has many life-threatening illnesses and has still been advised not to meet in confined spaces with too many people. We do have plans to meet up outdoors in the summer sometime, so that will be good, as we can get to finally hug our goddaughter's year old 'rainbow' twins!
Anyway, I digress too much. This book is heading for my wish list, thanks for sharing :)
I am glad you were able to read and review this in time for the 1940 Club. I have Rutland's three books on the Kindle but I did not know that she had only written three books. I will definitely have to get to this one soon, although unlikeable characters are not my favorite. The setting sounds great.
I have never fished but my grandparents loved to fish. They had a "cabin" on the river when I was a child and went out early to fish on many mornings. When I first went there it was pretty rustic with an outhouse, but not long after that they bought a lot and built a pretty nice house there. I have pleasant memories of that, mostly.
I love when you can get a book like this for so little money! And these old-fashioned mysteries are a lot of fun to read, because you do get such a sense of the time period when they were written. And the Wales setting sounds amazing. I'd love to go there someday, too.
Yvonne: What I can't understand in some of these vintage stories is how so many people were able to have so much time off work. Go away for fishing holiday for a couple of months? No problem. Things must've been very different back then.
Sitting by the river bank reading while D fishes sounds lovely to me. Maybe not all the answering of calls though.
Gwynnedd is lovely. We used to go up there fairly often, in fact Wales has always drawn us like a magnet. When our grand-daughter decided to go to Swansea uni that was even more of an excuse to go. Sorry to hear about your friend's serious health issues, how awful.
Thanks for dropping by and have a good week.
Tracy: Yes, only three books... I've no idea why and it's a shame, she didn't die until 1962 so death was not the reson. There isn't even a photogrpah of her apparently.
Your grandparents having a cabin to go to on the river sounds absolutely idyllic to me. I bet that was a child's dream come true.
Lark: It's so great to get a little time capsule like this for so little money. It was published in 1940 but I think it must've have been written in the late 30s because there's no mention at all of WW2. The feel of it is much more 'between the wars', very laid back, which I don't think it would've been if there'd been a war on. For a start they probably would not have been allowed to travel from London to Wales.
Haven't heard about the author, and from your review, it's not very intriguing either.
Fanda: Not really, no, but it was 'ok'. Looking forward to 1962 in October when I will probably read The Moonspinners by Mary Stewart.
Post a Comment